ATOM INDEXING METHODOLOGY
Investment-Grade Standards for AI Pricing Intelligence
Deterministic, zero-variance indexing, transparent construction, and rigorous quality controls.
Built by information economists with 25+ years advising C-suite teams on pricing strategy.
Methodology Standards
Index Composition
Index Construction
Reference
AIPI (ATOM Inference Price Index) methodology was developed by information economists with 25+ years advising enterprise C-suite teams on pricing intelligence and revenue strategy. AIPI follows financial index methodology standards comparable to S&P, MSCI, and Bloomberg indexes.
Why Investment-Grade
AIPI meets institutional investment standards through rigorous methodology that ensures transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy:
  • Deterministic extraction — Rules-based logic, not AI estimation or web scraping
  • Reproducible calculations — Same inputs always produce same outputs
  • Composition-adjusted — Chained matched-model methodology isolates actual price movements from vendor model mix changes
  • Transparent methodology — Publicly documented construction process
  • Audit trail — All data points tracked from source to index
  • Human verification overlay — Analyst review for edge cases and validation
Data Quality Standards
Every price in AIPI undergoes rigorous quality controls to ensure institutional-grade accuracy:
Standard Implementation
Deterministic Extraction Every price is extracted using rules-based logic programmed to recognize vendor-specific pricing page formats. No AI interpretation, no estimation, no guesswork.
Zero Estimation We never interpolate, extrapolate, or estimate pricing. If a vendor does not publish a price, it is not included in the index.
Human Verification Information economists manually review: (1) New vendor pricing page formats, (2) Ambiguous pricing structures, (3) Price changes exceeding 20% week-over-week, (4) Regional availability verification
Audit Trail Original and normalized prices are stored with extraction timestamps, enabling full verification of any index value back to source data.
24-Hour Freshness Automated monitoring detects vendor pricing updates and processes changes within 24 hours of publication.
Historical Data Depth
AIPI historical data is available from December 2024 forward. For vendors onboarded after this date, pricing history begins at the vendor's onboarding date. Historical data is updated retroactively when vendors publish prior period pricing information.
Period Coverage
December 2024 - Present Full coverage for all vendors onboarded by December 2024
New Vendors History begins at onboarding date; retroactive backfill if vendor provides historical pricing
Index Calculation Indexes are calculated for all periods with sufficient vendor representation (minimum 3 vendors)
Industry Comparison
AIPI provides a fundamentally different approach to AI pricing intelligence compared to traditional alternatives:
Source Update Frequency Methodology Coverage
Industry Reports Monthly or Quarterly Analyst research, surveys, selective vendor sampling Limited (5-15 vendors)
Analyst Surveys Quarterly Self-reported data, voluntary participation Variable
Vendor Websites Ad-hoc Manual checking, no normalization Single vendor only
AIPI Public Weekly (Automated) Deterministic extraction, normalized, indexed 25 benchmark indexes
AIPI Premium Daily (Automated) Deterministic extraction, normalized, indexed -- SKUs, -- vendors
Coverage Growth
ATOM continuously expands coverage as new vendors enter the AI inference market and existing vendors expand their offerings:
Metric Current Status
SKU Coverage -- inference SKUs tracked globally
Vendor Coverage -- AI vendors across foundation model developers, inference platforms, and cloud marketplaces
Geographic Coverage -- regions: Global, North America, Europe, Greater China, Advanced Asia, Middle East
Onboarding Rate 2-4 new vendors per month, prioritizing market leaders and high-growth platforms
Expansion Roadmap Targeting 50+ vendors and 2,000+ SKUs by Q2 2026
For more information, please contact us.
The AIPI (ATOM Inference Price Index) tracks AI inference costs across -- vendors and -- regions, providing investors, analysts, and business executives with transparent pricing intelligence.
Index Categories
Category What It Tracks Key Question
Modality AI capability type What does it cost to run this type of AI workload?
Structure Vendor type in the supply chain Where is value captured and where do arbitrage opportunities exist?
Tier Model capability level What is the premium for top tier intelligence versus budget alternatives?
Region Codes
Code Region Countries
GLB Global All countries
NA North America United States, Canada
EU Europe France, Germany, UK
CN Greater China China
ADV Advanced Asia Singapore, South Korea, Japan
ME Middle East UAE, Israel
Modality Indexes
Index Code Description Unit
AIPI TXT (GLB, NA, CN, EU) Text generation models from leading AI vendors per 1,000 tokens
AIPI MML (GLB, NA) Multimodal models from leading AI vendors per 1,000 tokens
AIPI IMG (GLB, NA, EU) Image generation models from leading AI vendors per image
AIPI AUD (GLB, NA) Audio transcription models from leading AI vendors per minute
AIPI VID (GLB, NA) Video generation models from leading AI vendors per second
AIPI VOC (GLB) Voice and speech synthesis models from leading AI vendors per 1,000 characters
Structure Indexes
Index Code Description Scope
AIPI FND (GLB, NA) Models from foundation model developers Direct API pricing
AIPI PLT (GLB, NA) Models from third party inference platforms Platform pricing
AIPI CLD (GLB, NA) Models from cloud provider marketplaces Marketplace pricing
Tier Indexes
Index Code Description Scope
AIPI FTR (GLB, NA) Top tier flagship models from leading AI vendors Flagship releases
AIPI BDG (GLB, NA) Low cost economy models from leading AI vendors Budget variants
AIPI RSN (GLB) Chain of thought reasoning models from leading AI vendors Reasoning models
Data Sources
Method Description
Direct Extraction Automated extraction from official vendor pricing pages using deterministic rules-based logic
API Ingestion Direct ingestion via vendor APIs where available, ensuring real-time accuracy
Analyst Curation Information economists manually review new vendor pricing formats, ambiguous pricing structures, price changes exceeding 20%, and regional availability verification
For more information, please contact us.
The AIPI (ATOM Inference Price Index) is built through a structured pipeline: qualifying data, excluding non-comparable pricing, normalizing units and currencies, and calculating composition-adjusted index values.
Inclusion Criteria
To be included in AIPI, a SKU must meet all of the following:
Criterion Requirement
Publicly listed Price must be published on the vendor's website
Pay as you go Standard on demand pricing only
Production ready Generally available models only
Matching unit Price must be convertible to the index's normalized unit
Exclusions
The following pricing types are excluded from AIPI:
Pricing Type Reason
Negotiated rates Not publicly verifiable
Enterprise contracts Not publicly verifiable
Committed use discounts Not comparable to on demand pricing
Volume tiers Only base tier (lowest volume) is indexed
Batch pricing Not comparable to real-time inference pricing
Subscriptions Not comparable to usage based pricing
Bundled models Cannot attribute price to single modality
Free tiers and trials Not representative of production costs
Beta and preview models Pricing may change at general availability
Legacy models No longer actively offered
Normalization
Vendors publish prices in different formats, units, and currencies. AIPI normalizes all prices to enable direct comparison.
Vendor Format Normalized To Conversion
per 1M tokens USD per 1K tokens ÷ 1,000
per 1K tokens USD per 1K tokens No change
per image USD per image No change
per million pixels USD per image × (resolution ÷ 1M) at 1080p
per second (video) USD per second No change
per million pixels (video) USD per second × (resolution ÷ 1M) × fps at 720p 24fps
per minute (audio) USD per minute No change
per second (audio) USD per minute × 60
per 1K characters USD per 1K characters No change
per character USD per 1K characters × 1,000
per page USD per page No change
Currency conversion: For CNY pricing, ATOM uses a fixed annual exchange rate (set January 1st, held for 12 months) rather than daily spot rates. This eliminates foreign exchange volatility from price trend analysis, isolating genuine AI pricing movements from currency fluctuations. Chinese vendors operate in a relatively stable pricing environment, and removing FX noise enables clearer analysis of strategic pricing decisions. All other currencies use daily spot rates as their pricing stability is well-established. The database stores both original and normalized prices for audit purposes.
Calculation Method: Chained Matched-Model
AIPI indexes use a chained matched-model methodology to isolate actual vendor price movements from changes in the composition of tracked models. This approach is standard practice in financial index construction (comparable to CPI matched-model methodology) and prevents model additions or removals from creating false price signals.
The problem it solves: In a rapidly evolving market, vendors frequently add new models and retire old ones. A simple average would shift whenever the model mix changes, even if no vendor actually changed a price. For example, if three expensive models are delisted in a given week, a simple average would show a price decline that never occurred. The matched-model approach eliminates this composition bias entirely.
How it works:
Step Description
1. Base week The earliest week in the dataset establishes the index level using a simple unweighted average of all qualifying SKUs.
2. Match For each subsequent week, identify the matched set: SKUs present in both the current and prior week. New additions and removals are excluded from the comparison.
3. Measure Compute the percentage change in the average price of the matched set between the two weeks. This captures only genuine vendor repricing.
4. Chain Apply that percentage change to the prior week's index value. The index level evolves continuously through chained multiplication.
5. Absorb New models enter the matched set the following week. Removed models exit silently. Neither event affects the index level at the point of change.
Base Week: Index(t=0) = AVERAGE(Price) for all qualifying SKUs

Subsequent: Matched_Change = AVG(Price_current) / AVG(Price_prior) for matched SKUs only
             Index(t) = Index(t-1) × Matched_Change
Why unweighted: Within each matched set, all vendors and models are weighted equally. This prevents market dominance by high-volume providers from skewing the index and ensures pricing trends from emerging vendors are visible alongside established players. The unweighted approach provides a balanced representation of the full pricing spectrum available to buyers.
Each index is calculated separately for three pricing directions:
Direction What It Measures
Input Cost to send tokens or data to the model
Cached Input Discounted rate for repeated or cached context
Output Cost for tokens or data generated by the model
AIPI Volatility Composite
The AIPI Volatility Composite measures week-over-week pricing stability across AI inference markets. Unlike the price indexes that track absolute levels, this composite tracks the percentage of models that changed price from one week to the next.
Calculation methodology: For each pricing direction (Input, Cached Input, Output), the system identifies models present in both the current and prior week (the matched set), then counts how many of those models changed price. The volatility percentage is calculated as:
Volatility % = (Matched Models with Price Changes ÷ Total Matched Models) × 100
Key features:
Feature Description
Matched-model basis Only models present in consecutive weeks are compared, ensuring new additions and removals do not inflate volatility
Model-level tracking Tracks changes at the model level to avoid triple-counting a single model repricing across Input, Cached, and Output
Directional splits Three separate volatility measures (Input, Cached Input, Output) reveal which pricing components are most dynamic
Zone classification Volatility levels are classified into zones: 0-2% STABLE, 2-4% HIGH, 4-6% EXTREME
Investment implications: Volatility levels above 2% historically coincide with major market events such as new flagship model launches, competitive repricing waves, or capacity constraints. The composite serves as an early warning system for pricing instability that may impact infrastructure budgets, vendor negotiations, or portfolio company cost structures. Institutional buyers use volatility trends to time vendor contract negotiations and assess competitive dynamics.
Benchmark context: Enterprise B2B API providers (Stripe, AWS, Twilio) typically maintain 99.5%+ weekly stability (under 0.5% volatility). AI inference markets show structurally higher volatility due to rapid innovation, competitive dynamics, and capacity optimization. The AIPI Volatility Composite provides a quantitative measure of this market characteristic, enabling investors and operators to monitor pricing stability trends over time.
Update Schedule
Activity Public (free) Premium (paid)
Price extraction Weekly (Monday) Daily
Index calculation Weekly (Monday) Daily
Dashboard refresh Instant Instant
Price change alerts Not available Instant
New vendor onboarding As available As available
Tier index review Quarterly Quarterly
Data freshness: Every SKU carries a Last Verified Date, the date when pricing was last confirmed against the vendor's published page. When a vendor updates pricing, ATOM's automated pipelines detect the change and update the database within 24 hours.
For more information, please contact us.
The AIPI (ATOM Inference Price Index) uses standardized terminology to ensure consistency across all indexes, reports, and data exports.
Glossary
Term Definition
SKU Stock Keeping Unit, a unique price point for a specific model, vendor, and direction combination
Index A benchmark measure calculated from composition-adjusted average prices of all SKUs matching specific criteria
Matched Set The group of SKUs present in both the current and prior week, used to calculate week-over-week price changes without composition bias
Chained Index An index value derived by applying matched-set percentage changes to the prior period's level, isolating genuine price movements from model mix changes
Normalized Price A vendor's price converted to AIPI's standard unit and currency for comparability
Direction Whether a price applies to Input tokens, Cached Input tokens, or Output tokens
Token A unit of text processing, roughly 4 characters or 0.75 words in English
Input Tokens Tokens sent to the model (prompt, context, instructions)
Output Tokens Tokens generated by the model (response, completion)
Cached Input Discounted rate when input tokens are reused from a previous request
Modality The type of AI capability (Text, Image, Audio, Video, Voice, Multimodal)
Vendor Type Classification of vendor's role: Model Developer, Inference Platform, or Cloud Marketplace
Tier Model capability classification: Frontier (flagship), Budget (economy), or Reasoning
Inference Running a trained AI model to generate outputs
Last Verified Date The date when a SKU's pricing was last confirmed against the vendor's published page
Volatility The percentage of matched models that changed price from one week to the next
Scope and Focus
AIPI is deliberately optimized for investment-grade pricing intelligence. The following capabilities define what AIPI is designed to deliver:
AIPI Optimizes For Description
Price Transparency Clear, normalized pricing data enabling direct vendor comparison
Market-Wide Trend Detection Identifying pricing movements, competitive dynamics, and market shifts
Vendor Positioning Analysis Understanding competitive positioning through pricing strategy
Budget Forecasting Accuracy Reliable data for AI infrastructure cost planning and modeling
AIPI indexes measure price only. The following dimensions are explicitly not covered, as they require different methodologies and data sources:
Out of Scope Why
Performance or latency AIPI tracks cost, not speed or throughput; performance benchmarks require separate infrastructure
Quality or capability A lower price does not imply lower quality; capability assessment requires domain-specific evaluation frameworks
Total cost of ownership Excludes infrastructure, egress, support, and integration costs which vary by deployment architecture
Fine tuning or training Only inference (running models) is tracked; training costs follow different pricing structures
For more information, please contact us.
Live Index Prices
Loading index prices...